Dermatologic Clinics
Volume 29, Issue 1 , Pages 21-32, January 2011

Community-associated Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Skin Infections in the Tropics

  • Steven Y.C. Tong, MBBS, FRACP, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Tropical and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Darwin, Northern Territory 0811, Australia
    • Infectious Diseases Department, Royal Darwin Hospital, 105 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, Northern Territory 0811, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Child Health, Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Darwin, Northern Territory 0811, Australia.
    • ,
  • Andrew C. Steer, MBBS, FRACP, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre for International Child Health, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Royal Children’s Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
    • ,
  • Adam W. Jenney, MBBS, FRACP, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre for International Child Health, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Royal Children’s Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
    • Infectious Diseases Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 75 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
    • ,
  • Jonathan R. Carapetis, MBBS, FRACP, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Infectious Diseases Department, Royal Darwin Hospital, 105 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, Northern Territory 0811, Australia
    • Child Health, Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Darwin, Northern Territory 0811, Australia

Article Outline

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) caused by Staphylococcus aureus are very common, particularly in children, in tropical regions. The proportion of S aureus SSTI caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus (CA-MRSA) varies according to region, but is up to 25% in some areas. There are diverse CA-MRSA clones, including several that harbor Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Key predisposing factors for staphylococcal infections are scabies infestation, overcrowding, poor hygiene, and inadequate water supplies. In the setting of a community outbreak of staphylococcal SSTI, interventions intended to improve personal and community hygiene are likely to be the most practical, effective, and achievable. Options for oral treatment of clinical infections caused by CA-MRSA include clindamycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Although rapid diagnostics are now available, and 2 vaccines have reached clinical trials, neither of these is likely to be of use in tropical, developing regions in the near future.

Keywords: Community-associated, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, Staphylococcus aureus, Skin and soft tissue infection, Tropical

 

Although most of the world’s population lives in tropical, developing regions, there has been comparatively little research into the epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in these areas. The high burden of disease caused by malaria, tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, together with a lack of diagnostic microbiology facilities and overall limitations in resource availability, impede understanding of S aureus infections. Available data suggest that skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) caused by S aureus are extremely common, particularly in children. In addition, there are high rates of S aureus infection in sterile sites (invasive infection) in these same regions, and SSTI are an important source of invasive infection.1 The understanding that strains of community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus (CA-MRSA) often emerge locally raises the possibility that MRSA is also widespread among populations in the tropics. This review focuses on skin-related manifestations of CA-MRSA in tropical regions and describes what is known about the epidemiology, effects of hygiene and living conditions, diagnosis, and treatment and prevention options at the individual and community levels.

Back to Article Outline

Epidemiology 

Most staphylococcal infections involve the skin and soft tissues, and, in tropical regions, such SSTI are abundant. The prevalence of pyoderma, scabies, and dermatophyte infections is high,2 with an estimated 111 million children in developing countries having pyoderma at any one time. Studies from the 1970s found the point prevalence of pyoderma in children to be 7% in Tanzania3, 4 and up to 25% in Panama.5 The Pacific region has a particularly high prevalence of SSTI. Recent studies in indigenous communities in tropical northern Australia found the point prevalence of pyoderma in children to range from 11% to 20%.6 In Fiji, the prevalence of pyoderma was 26% in primary school children and 12% in infants.7 The rates of scabies infection are similarly high, and scabies is a common antecedent for skin infection in these regions.3, 4, 6, 7, 8 The most common bacterial pathogens of SSTI are Streptococcus pyogenes and S aureus, with recent studies finding recovery rates from swabs of pyoderma lesions of 29% to 80% and 57% to 80% for S pyogenes (group A β-hemolytic streptococci) and S aureus, respectively. Frequently, individual sores are infected with both pathogens.7, 9, 10, 11

These superficial bacterial infections are not always innocuous. Complications include bacteremia12, 13, 14 and other invasive diseases, and, for S pyogenes, the nonsuppurative sequelae of poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis15 and also possibly acute rheumatic fever.16 S aureus typically ranks as the third or fourth most commonly isolated bacterial pathogen in surveys of bacteremia in the developing world,17, 18, 19, 20, 21 with skin infections frequently the primary source of the bacteremia.1, 22 Mortality from S aureus bacteremia in low-resource regions is typically high. For example, in a hospital in northeastern Thailand, the case mortality for patients with S aureus sepsis was 52%, causing an estimated 1% of all hospital deaths.23

Although S pyogenes remains invariably sensitive to penicillin, antibiotic management for S aureus depends on local rates of antimicrobial resistance. Some experts suggest that if the prevalence of CA-MRSA is greater than 10% in clinical isolates in any given population, then these populations should be considered as high prevalence and β-lactam antibiotics should not be used as empiric therapy for staphylococcal infections.24 Most studies in tropical regions have been conducted in inpatient hospital settings where rates of methicillin resistance among all S aureus infections range from less than 10% to close to 50%, with most of this attributed to health care–associated (HA) MRSA strains.25, 26, 27, 28 Community-based studies of nasal colonization in India and Brazil found lower rates of MRSA carriage, ranging from 0% to 4%.29, 30, 31, 32, 33

However, hospital-based studies and colonization data may not reflect the epidemiology of S aureus in community-based SSTI. The few recent studies in tropical and developing country settings that have concentrated on SSTI in outpatients or community-based cohorts showed that CA-MRSA constituted 23% and 11% of S aureus recovered from pyoderma lesions in Australian indigenous9 and Indian settings11 respectively, and also 15% of S aureus recovered from SSTI in Hong Kong.34 Several factors may be contributing to the emergence of CA-MRSA from circulating methicillin-susceptible S aureus (MSSA) strains in less-developed settings; these factors include high rates of secondarily infected scabies, domestic crowding, poor skin hygiene, and the ready availability and use of β-lactam antibiotics.12, 35 In support of this, detailed molecular studies have shown that strains of MSSA acquire the resistance determinant mecA, carried on SCCmec, much more frequently than was previously appreciated.36

Nowhere has the problem of CA-MRSA been so striking as in the United States, where CA-MRSA infections have become more common than health care–associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) infections. For example, in San Francisco, the incidence of all types of CA-MRSA infections in 2005 was 316 per 100,000 population, compared with 31 cases of HA-MRSA infections per 100,000.37 This increase is the direct result of a prevalent strain of CA-MRSA, the USA300 strain.38, 39, 40, 41

Unlike in the United States, tropical regions have observed a diversity of circulating CA-MRSA clones (Table 1).9, 34, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 Different clones are typically distinguished by established genotyping techniques such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis or multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Using MLST, which involves sequencing the internal fragments of 7 housekeeping genes, S aureus has been shown to be a species with distinct clonal lineages or clonal complexes. Many clones can be found across different continents and include clonal complexes (CC) 30, 8, 45, 15, 5, and 1. However, the proportional representation of these clones varies according to geography. For example, CC30 is common in Singapore and Hong Kong,44, 53 and CC93 is the most prevalent clone of hospital-based isolates in northern Australia.45

Table 1. Dominant clones of CA-MRSA in tropical regions as determined by multilocus sequence typing
RegionCloneReferences
East and southeast AsiaST30, ST59, ST83434, 42, 43, 44
Australia (tropical) and Pacific islandsST93, ST30, CC75, ST8 (USA300) in Hawaii9, 45, 46, 47
Subcontinent (India and Pakistan)ST77248
AfricaST88, ST5, ST30, ST8049, 50, 51
Latin AmericaST8 (USA300)52

Abbreviation: ST, sequence type.

Perhaps most intriguing is a phylogenetically divergent clone called CC75, which occurs mainly in the tropics.46 Despite the extensive characterization of S aureus in developed countries, CC75 has to date only been reported in the literature in northern Australia and Cambodia.9, 45, 46, 54 In addition, analysis of the S aureus multilocus sequence type (MLST) database (http://saureus.mlst.net/) reveals isolates with CC75 alleles from Malaysia, Indonesia, and, somewhat incongruously, Ireland and the Czech Republic. We have also found CC75 in Fiji.55 CC75 is a phylogenetic outlier whose presence may be related to crowded living conditions, poor skin hygiene, and frequent skin infections.

Several virulence factors have been identified in CA-MRSA isolates,56 most notably Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL). This bicomponent toxin can form pores in the cell membrane of host leukocytes. Early epidemiologic studies linked PVL with cutaneous abscesses, severe SSTI, and necrotizing pneumonia.57, 58 However, controversy exists as to the exact role of PVL. It was not associated with worse outcomes in a multicountry study of complicated SSTI,59 nor in a Thai study of bacteremic patients.60 There are also conflicting results regarding the role of PVL from studies using mouse models of SSTI.61, 62, 63 Several recent independent clinical studies in Australia and New Zealand have shown a significant association between PVL and cutaneous furunculosis or skin and soft tissue abscesses.45, 64, 65 PVL is also expressed frequently in MSSA isolates; approximately 50% of MSSA isolates from Africa and northern Australia harbor the pvl genes.45, 66 Thus, MSSA is likely to be a significant, but under-recognized, contributor to the burden of PVL disease in these settings.

In summary, evidence suggests that S aureus–related SSTI produces a significant burden of disease in tropical communities. Up to 25% of staphylococcal isolates are CA-MRSA, and ecological conditions favor the emergence and spread of resistance. Of concern, a considerable proportion of both CA-MRSA and MSSA strains causing SSTI harbor the PVL gene, which may cause more severe clinical manifestations.

Back to Article Outline

Predisposing factors 

Perhaps the most important predisposing factor for SSTI in tropical zones is the presence of scabies infestation (ie, epidermal infestation by the mite, Sarcoptes scabiei). Scabies lesions that are secondarily infected by S pyogenes or S aureus are very common in many tropical settings. For example, in Fiji, 57% of infants and 30% of children with scabies had evidence of secondary bacterial infection.7 A reduction in the prevalence of scabies can lead to a reduction in the prevalence of impetigo. This reduction was clearly shown in Panama after mass drug administration program for scabies with permethrin cream, where the prevalence of impetigo was reduced from 32% to 2%. Similarly, in the Solomon Islands after mass drug administration with oral ivermectin, the prevalence of impetigo was reduced from 40% to 21%.67, 68 In addition, community-based treatment of scabies with permethrin in an indigenous Australian community led to a reduction in scabies prevalence from 28.8% to less than 10%. This treatment resulted in a sustained 2-year reduction in impetigo prevalence in children from 69% to less than 35%, with residual impetigo in children being less severe (fewer purulent and crusted lesions).69

Overcrowding, poor hygiene, limited water supply, and hot, humid weather have all been linked to SSTI in tropical zones.4, 70 These factors reflect the important role that low socioeconomic status plays; in the main, SSTI in tropical zones is a disease of poverty. Overcrowding is important because of the close personal contact required for transmission of S pyogenes, S aureus, and scabies.71, 72 Washing with water seems to play an important role in the prevention of impetigo. A randomized controlled trial of handwashing promotion and plain soap in Pakistan found a reduction in the incidence of impetigo amongst children of 34% in the intervention group.73 Antibacterial soap did not provide an advantage compared with plain soap, suggesting that the cleansing process with water is the key factor. This conclusion was supported by a further study in an Australian aboriginal community in which access to a swimming pool was associated with a reduction in the prevalence of impetigo in children, from 62% to 18%.74

Back to Article Outline

Diagnosis 

Unless there are clinical features that suggest unusual pathogens, most cases of impetigo and furunculosis are caused by S pyogenes or S aureus, or sometimes both. Knowledge of the local antimicrobial resistance pattern of S aureus helps to determine whether culturing such lesions will be clinically useful. In resource-poor regions, there is likely to be limited benefit to routine culture of such lesions if rates of MRSA are low. In regions with higher rates of MRSA, clinicians must consider whether to culture infected lesions, or whether changing the empirical therapy away from β-lactams will be more effective.

Point-of-care rapid diagnostics to determine whether MRSA or PVL-producing isolates are present in lesions are now becoming available. For example, Cepheid has a SSTI kit that can detect S aureus and MRSA, with a reported sensitivity of 97% for MRSA in wound specimens.75 An initial study of an immunochromatographic test for PVL that can be used with clinical specimens found the assay to have a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 100% compared with polymerase chain reaction detection of pvl genes in the same S aureus isolates.76 Despite these promising advances, there are currently no clinical trials to demonstrate that directing therapy against the PVL toxin improves outcome in cases of SSTI. Furthermore, the kits can be prohibitively expensive. Therefore, at this stage, such rapid diagnostics are unlikely to enter widespread clinical use, especially in the developing world.

Back to Article Outline

Treatment of uncomplicated SSTI caused by CA-MRSA 

An important initial step in the management of staphylococcal SSTI is to recognize severe and/or complicated infection (including sepsis, toxic shock, pneumonia, and osteomyelitis). In addition, identifying certain factors that predispose to severe infection, such as extremes of age, comorbid illness (such as diabetes), malnutrition, and immunocompromised states is important. Careful clinical assessment to identify signs that suggest deeper infection or sepsis is critical. A simple algorithm for the assessment and treatment of children in the tropics who have common tropical skin infections has been developed for incorporation into the World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Management of Childhood Illness program (Fig. 1 and Table 2).77 This algorithm, designed to assist primary health care workers, was found to be a robust tool in a validation study and is a useful guide for deciding how to proceed with the management of SSTI in children.77

(Data from Steer AC, Tikoduadua LV, Manalac EM, et al. Validation of an integrated management of childhood illness algorithm for managing common skin conditions in Fiji. Bull World Health Organ 2009;87(3):174.)

Table 2. Modified WHO Integrated Management of Childhood Illness algorithm for classification of common childhood skin conditions
Adapted from Steer AC, Tikoduadua LV, Manalac EM, et al. Validation of an integrated management of childhood illness algorithm for managing common skin conditions in Fiji. Bull World Health Organ 2009;87(3):174.
SignDiagnosisAction
Any general danger sign (including unable to feed, vomiting all food provided, lethargy)
Extensive warm redness or swelling		Very severe skin infectionGive first dose of appropriate antibiotic
Refer urgently to hospital
Swelling or redness around eyesPeriorbital or orbital cellulitisGive first dose of appropriate antibiotic
Refer urgently to hospital
Localized warm tender swelling and rednessAbscess or cellulitisGive first dose of appropriate antibiotic
Refer to hospital: small abscesses (<5 cm) may be able to be drained without the need for antibiotics
Discrete sores/lesions with pus or crustsImpetigoIf small/single impetigo lesion, consider gentian violet or simple hygiene methods such as daily cleansing with soap and clean water
Otherwise, give appropriate oral antibiotic for 7 d
Follow-up in 5 d
Itchiness and papulesScabiesProvide topical permethrin skin cream
Treat the whole family with permethrin cream
Follow-up in 2 wk
Round to oval flat scaly patches, often itchyFungal infectionGive appropriate topical antifungal for 2 wk
Follow-up in 2 wk
If there are not enough signs to classify in any of the above boxes OR if other signs present are not found in the above boxesOther skin conditionsRefer to the doctor or skin clinic

Drainage of Abscesses 

As outlined earlier, CA-MRSA frequently causes skin abscesses. In patients with small, simple abscesses (<5 cm), incision and drainage alone is usually adequate and obviates the need for antibiotic treatment.78 However, in select situations, it may be reasonable to add an antibiotic that is active against MRSA; for example, if there is cellulitis surrounding the abscess or if adequate clinical follow-up cannot be assured.

Topical Treatments: Disinfecting Agents 

In some patients with simple localized impetigo (eg, a small single lesion), the use of simple hygiene measures such as washing with clean water (±soap) often suffices as treatment by disinfecting the lesion. In addition, a variety of topical disinfecting treatments are available including hexachlorophene, chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone-iodine, and gentian violet; however, few data support their use.79 Extensive clinical experience suggests that gentian violet is useful in simple and localized impetigo,80 and some laboratory and clinical data suggest that gentian violet is effective against MRSA impetigo and colonization.81, 82 However, we recommend against its use in isolation in patients who have extensive impetigo, which is the most common clinical presentation in these tropical, developing countries.

Topical Treatments: Antimicrobial Agents 

A Cochrane systematic review in 2004 concluded that topical treatment of localized impetigo with either mupirocin or fusidic acid is at least as effective as treatment with oral antibiotics.83 These 2 topical agents were superior in studies comparing them with oral erythromycin, not the more routinely used agents such as cephalexin or (flu)cloxacillin. Also, the studies included in the Cochrane review were in patients with localized impetigo, not the widespread, often severe, lesions that are often seen in tropical settings. Furthermore, there is considerable risk of the rapid development of resistance for both these agents.84, 85, 86 Other topical treatments, such as bacitracin, are either equivalent or inferior to both placebo and oral antibiotics.83 For these reasons, we do not recommend the routine use of topical antimicrobials for treatment of impetigo in tropical regions.

Oral Antibiotics for Uncomplicated SSTI 

In clinical trials for the treatment of impetigo, a consistent finding has been the high rate of clinical response to placebo (whether oral or topical); this suggests that a certain proportion of cases of impetigo will resolve without antibiotic treatment.83 The decision to initiate oral antibiotic treatment of SSTI should be based on the extent of the disease (both in terms of number of lesions and the extent of individual lesions), as well as the risk of extension of local disease and the risk of systemic bacterial invasion. In addition, there are public health considerations in trying to prevent spread to other individuals, particularly in tropical zones where poststreptococcal sequelae are common.87 Parenteral therapy should be considered in patients with extensive disease, patients with fever, or those in whom adherence to oral therapy is likely to be poor. Intravenous therapy is indicated in patients with suspected invasive disease, as discussed later.

As outlined earlier, the most prominent pathogens that require treatment are S pyogenes or S aureus, and antibiotic choice should be directed toward both these pathogens. To date, no S pyogenes isolate has been found to be resistant to penicillin, and therefore a β-lactam antibiotic remains appropriate for S pyogenes. However, the choice of empiric antibiotic for treatment of staphylococcal SSTI is less simple and depends on local susceptibility patterns.35 A variety of oral agents are available, including clindamycin, doxycycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole), and linezolid. There have been no head-to-head, randomized, controlled trials of oral antibiotic therapy for CA-MRSA SSTI.

Clindamycin 

In much of the United States, where the USA300 strain of CA-MRSA is most prevalent, clindamycin is commonly used for SSTI caused by CA-MRSA. Clindamycin is generally well tolerated, is well absorbed orally, with a bioavailability approaching 100%, and reaches high tissue concentrations, making it an excellent antibiotic for the treatment of soft tissue infections. Because it is a protein synthesis inhibitor, it also has the theoretic advantage of inhibiting toxin production, including PVL.88 Its drawbacks include that it is bacteriostatic rather than bactericidal, the risk of Clostridium difficile infection, the need for dosing 3 to 4 times a day, poor palatability of pediatric formulations, and concerns about inducing resistance. Resistance rates to clindamycin apparently vary by strain; in the past, the USA300 strain has appeared to have been consistently susceptible to clindamycin, although recent reports suggest that this may be changing.89, 90 The situation is less clear in tropical developing regions where fewer data are available. An important caveat is the issue of inducible resistance, or macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance, which is usually encoded by the erm gene.91 The MLSB resistance mechanism should be tested for using the D-zone test when a staphylococcal isolate is resistant to erythromycin but susceptible to clindamycin; if the D-zone test is positive, clindamycin should not be used because of the risk of clinical failure.92 Approximately 25% of CA-MRSA isolates in northern Australia and Hong Kong have been found to have inducible clindamycin resistance.12, 34

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Co-trimoxazole) 

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is also commonly used in the treatment of CA-MRSA soft tissue infection. Although it is commonly believed that S pyogenes is constitutively resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, recent data suggest that it may be effective.93 Therefore, it may be a useful agent in tropical zones where S pyogenes, MSSA, and CA-MRSA are the major causes of skin infections. In a retrospective comparative study of more than 400 children with CA-MRSA SSTI, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and clindamycin were found to be comparable in their effectiveness.94 A large, randomized, controlled trial of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with intramuscular benzathine penicillin G is currently underway in the Northern Territory of Australia (Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12609000858291).

Doxycycline and Linezolid 

There are few data on which to base a recommendation for use of doxycycline or linezolid in the treatment of CA-MRSA SSTI. Doxycycline is inexpensive, but is contraindicated in children aged less than 8 years because of effects on dentition and bone growth. Linezolid is a protein synthesis inhibitor that has been found to be more effective than vancomycin or β-lactam antibiotics for treatment of SSTI.95, 96 However, its use is limited by its high cost and potential for side effects such as thrombocytopenia.

Back to Article Outline

Treatment of severe infections caused by CA-MRSA 

Invasive infections with CA-MRSA have a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, with the most common being bacteremia, severe sepsis, necrotizing pneumonia, osteomyelitis, and pyomyositis. CA-MRSA–associated necrotizing fasciitis has also been reported. Vancomycin is the mainstay of treatment of these infections, although treatment failures have been reported. Many experts recommend the addition of a protein synthesis inhibitor such as clindamycin or linezolid to decrease toxin production (including PVL and the toxic shock syndrome toxin-1). In areas where clindamycin resistance is known to be high, and where linezolid is available, it may be preferable to use linezolid initially and change to a less expensive antibiotic once susceptibility results are known. Several newer agents are also available for use against CA-MRSA, although few are used in tropical developing countries; these include daptomycin, tigecycline, and quinupristin-dalfopristin.

Back to Article Outline

Management of community outbreaks 

Outbreaks of CA-MRSA infections have been described in sporting teams,97 correctional facilities,98, 99 military camps,100, 101 and some small villages.102, 103 A consistent finding is the importance of personal hygiene. Infections or carriage caused by CA-MRSA have been associated with poorer hygiene practices in correctional facilities,98 with sharing bars of soap or towels in sporting teams,104 and using a contaminated sauna in a rural Alaskan village.105 General recommendations provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Web site (http://www.cdc.gov/mrsa/prevent/index.html) to prevent transmission of S aureus include covering wounds; frequent hand washing; avoiding sharing personal items; washing of soiled sheets, towels, and clothes; and regular cleaning of environmental surfaces that come into contact with the skin.

Apart from interventions aimed at improving hygiene practices, some groups have attempted more aggressive case finding and decolonization of subjects found to be colonized.102, 104, 106 Such an approach terminated an outbreak of PVL positive MSSA infections in a small German village.102 All 144 members of this village were tested for colonization by nasal swab and those who were colonized with S aureus or had current or relapsing furuncles underwent stringent decolonization procedures together with their family members. This process involved application of nasal mupirocin 3 times daily for 5 days; daily treatment of skin and hair with an octenidine-based wash solution; antiseptic treatment of the throat with 0.1% chlorhexidine solution 3 times daily; daily disinfection of personal items with an alcohol-based antimicrobial cleanser; and daily changing and washing of towels, bedclothes, and clothing. These measures eventually ended the outbreak. The ability to carry out these interventions on a village-level scale bears witness to the impressive efforts of the public health team and investigators. However, it is doubtful that this could be accomplished in other settings, particularly those with resource limitations, inadequate facilities for bathing and washing, and overcrowded households. Our experience indicates that even the basic CDC recommendations for personal hygiene are often difficult to achieve.

Casting further doubt on the efficacy of decolonizing strategies at the community level were the results of a cluster randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of targeted mupirocin therapy in CA-MRSA–colonized soldiers.107 In this study of 3447 soldiers, there was no statistical difference in frequency of CA-MRSA infections in soldiers found to be already colonized and then given mupirocin or placebo, and no difference in incidence of SSTI or new CA-MRSA colonizations between groups of soldiers randomized to each arm. Thus, the CDC does not currently recommend routine screening for MRSA colonization, nor for eradication of colonization in infected persons or their contacts.108

In a community outbreak, we would suggest interventions to improve personal and community hygiene. Such strategies have been effective in halting outbreaks in a religious community109 and in a correctional facility.110 If an outbreak continues unabated and resources are available, then targeted screening for colonization and subsequent eradication for cases and household contacts could be considered.

Back to Article Outline

Vaccination against S aureus 

Although there has been considerable preclinical and clinical research into both active and passive immunization against S aureus, an effective strategy has not emerged.111 Progress in the development of a viable active vaccine has faced several hurdles, including an incomplete understanding of pathogenesis of S aureus infection. There are few clinical and epidemiologic data to support the notion that immune protection is achieved after a single vaccination against S aureus infection; this is particularly the case for CA-MRSA, where recurrent SSTI is common.24 Two vaccine candidates (StaphVAX and IsdB) have reached clinical trials.112, 113 StaphVAX is a conjugate vaccine of 2 capsular polysaccharides (CP5 and CP8) that are present in many clinical S aureus isolates. Two phase III trials of this vaccine have been conducted in patients on hemodialysis. The first trial was promising because it showed greater than a 50% reduction in S aureus bacteremia in the first 40 weeks after vaccination.112 However, the second, larger, but as yet unpublished, trial failed to show a benefit.111 Results of a phase II trial of a vaccine using IsdB, a cell wall protein, have similarly not been published.111 Passive immunization using antistaphylococcal antibodies has been studied in high-risk groups, particularly premature and low birth weight infants, but clinical trials in this group have failed to show a benefit in reducing bacterial infections.114 In summary, successful immunization against S aureus in high-risk groups has still not been achieved, and a routinely available antistaphylococcal vaccination for the developing world remains a more distant goal.

Back to Article Outline

Summary 

SSTI caused by S aureus are very common, particularly in children, in tropical regions. The proportion of S aureus SSTI caused by CA-MRSA varies according to region, but is up to 25% in some areas. There are diverse CA-MRSA clones, including several that harbor PVL. Key predisposing factors for staphylococcal infections are scabies infestation, overcrowding, poor hygiene, and inadequate water supplies. In the setting of a community outbreak of staphylococcal SSTI, interventions intended to improve personal and community hygiene are likely to be the most practical, effective, and achievable. Options for oral treatment of clinical infections caused by CA-MRSA include clindamycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Although rapid diagnostics are now available, and 2 vaccines have reached clinical trials, neither of these is likely to be of use in tropical, developing regions in the near future.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Skull SA, Krause V, Coombs G, et al. Investigation of a cluster of Staphylococcus aureus invasive infection in the top end of the Northern Territory. Aust N Z J Med. 1999;29(1):66–72
  2. Andrews RM, McCarthy J, Carapetis JR, et al. Skin disorders, including pyoderma, scabies, and tinea infections. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009;56(6):1421–1440
  3. Masawe AE, Nsanzumuhire H. Scabies and other skin diseases in pre-school children in Ujamaa villages in Tanzania. Trop Geogr Med. 1975;27(3):288–294
  4. Masawe AE, Nsanzumuhire H, Mhalu F. Bacterial skin infections in preschool and school children in coastal Tanzania. Arch Dermatol. 1975;111(10):1312–1316
  5. Allen AM, Taplin D. Skin infections in eastern Panama. Survey of two representative communities. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1974;23(5):950–956
  6. McDonald MI, Towers RJ, Andrews RM, et al. Low rates of streptococcal pharyngitis and high rates of pyoderma in Australian aboriginal communities where acute rheumatic fever is hyperendemic. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(6):683–689
  7. Steer AC, Jenney AW, Kado J, et al. High burden of impetigo and scabies in a tropical country. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(6):e467
  8. Clucas DB, Carville KS, Connors C, et al. Disease burden and health-care clinic attendances for young children in remote aboriginal communities of northern Australia. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(4):275–281
  9. McDonald M, Dougall A, Holt D, et al. Use of a single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping system to demonstrate the unique epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in remote aboriginal communities. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(10):3720–3727
  10. Valery PC, Wenitong M, Clements V, et al. Skin infections among indigenous Australians in an urban setting in far North Queensland. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136(8):1103–1108
  11. Nagaraju U, Bhat G, Kuruvila M, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in community-acquired pyoderma. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43(6):412–414
  12. Tong SY, Bishop EJ, Lilliebridge RA, et al. Community-associated strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus in indigenous northern Australia: epidemiology and outcomes. J Infect Dis. 2009;199(10):1461–1470
  13. Steer AC, Jenney AJ, Oppedisano F, et al. High burden of invasive beta-haemolytic streptococcal infections in Fiji. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136(5):621–627
  14. Carapetis JR, Walker AM, Hibble M, et al. Clinical and epidemiological features of group a streptococcal bacteraemia in a region with hyperendemic superficial streptococcal infection. Epidemiol Infect. 1999;122:59–65
  15. White AV, Hoy WE, McCredie DA. Childhood post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis as a risk factor for chronic renal disease in later life. Med J Aust. 2001;174(10):492–496
  16. McDonald M, Currie BJ, Carapetis JR. Acute rheumatic fever: a chink in the chain that links the heart to the throat?. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4:240–245
  17. Hill PC, Onyeama CO, Ikumapayi UN, et al. Bacteraemia in patients admitted to an urban hospital in West Africa. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:2
  18. Asrat D, Amanuel YW. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from blood culture in Tikur Anbassa hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 2001;39(2):97–104
  19. Shwe TN, Nyein MM, Yi W, et al. Blood culture isolates from children admitted to medical unit III, Yangon Children’s Hospital, 1998. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2002;33(4):764–771
  20. Blomberg B, Manji KP, Urassa WK, et al. Antimicrobial resistance predicts death in Tanzanian children with bloodstream infections: a prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:43
  21. Phetsouvanh R, Phongmany S, Soukaloun D, et al. Causes of community-acquired bacteremia and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Vientiane, Laos. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75(5):978–985
  22. John R, Naraqi S, McDonnell G. The clinical spectrum of staphylococcal bacteraemia: a review of 101 Melanesian patients from Papua New Guinea. P N G Med J. 1990;33(3):229–233
  23. Nickerson EK, Hongsuwan M, Limmathurotsakul D, et al. Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in a tropical setting: patient outcome and impact of antibiotic resistance. PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4308
  24. David MZ, Daum RS. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(3):616–687
  25. Ghaznavi-Rad E, Nor Shamsudin M, Sekawi Z, et al. Predominance and emergence of clones of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Malaysia. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(3):867–872
  26. Gadepalli R, Dhawan B, Kapil A, et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue isolates from three Indian hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2009;73(3):253–263
  27. Brown PD, Ngeno C. Antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from hospital and community sources in southern Jamaica. Int J Infect Dis. 2007;11(3):220–225
  28. Kesah C, Ben Redjeb S, Odugbemi TO, et al. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in eight African hospitals and Malta. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003;9(2):153–156
  29. Lamaro-Cardoso J, de Lencastre H, Kipnis A, et al. Molecular epidemiology and risk factors for nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus in infants attending day care centers in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(12):3991–3997
  30. Chatterjee SS, Ray P, Aggarwal A, et al. A community-based study on nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Res. 2009;130(6):742–748
  31. Ribeiro J, Boyce JM, Zancanaro PQ. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients visiting the emergency room at a tertiary hospital in Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis. 2005;9(1):52–55
  32. Lamaro-Cardoso J, Castanheira M, de Oliveira RM, et al. Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children in Brazil. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;57(4):467–470
  33. Ruimy R, Maiga A, Armand-Lefevre L, et al. The carriage population of Staphylococcus aureus from Mali is composed of a combination of pandemic clones and the divergent Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive genotype ST152. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(11):3962–3968
  34. Ho PL, Chuang SK, Choi YF, et al. Community-associated methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: skin and soft tissue infections in Hong Kong. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;61(3):245–250
  35. Tong SY, McDonald MI, Holt DC, et al. Global implications of the emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in indigenous populations. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(12):1871–1878
  36. Nubel U, Roumagnac P, Feldkamp M, et al. Frequent emergence and limited geographic dispersal of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(37):14130–14135
  37. Liu C, Graber CJ, Karr M, et al. A population-based study of the incidence and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in San Francisco, 2004–2005. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(11):1637–1646
  38. Johnson JK, Khoie T, Shurland S, et al. Skin and soft tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 clone. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(8):1195–1200
  39. Hersh AL, Chambers HF, Maselli JH, et al. National trends in ambulatory visits and antibiotic prescribing for skin and soft-tissue infections. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(14):1585–1591
  40. King MD, Humphrey BJ, Wang YF, et al. Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 clone as the predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(5):309–317
  41. Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, et al. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(7):666–674
  42. Chheng K, Tarquinio S, Wuthiekanun V, et al. Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with pediatric infection in Cambodia. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6630
  43. Fan J, Shu M, Zhang G, et al. Biogeography and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6216
  44. Hsu LY, Koh YL, Chlebicka NL, et al. Establishment of ST30 as the predominant clonal type among community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Singapore. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(3):1090–1093
  45. Tong SY, Lilliebridge RA, Bishop EJ, et al. Clinical correlates of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), PVL isoforms, and clonal complex in the Staphylococcus aureus population of northern Australia. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(5):760–769
  46. Ng JW, Holt DC, Lilliebridge RA, et al. Phylogenetically distinct Staphylococcus aureus lineage prevalent among indigenous communities in northern Australia. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(7):2295–2300
  47. Estivariz CF, Park SY, Hageman JC, et al. Emergence of community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Hawaii, 2001–2003. J Infect. 2007;54(4):349–357
  48. D’Souza N, Rodrigues C, Mehta A. Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with emergence of epidemic clones of sequence type (ST) 22 and ST 772 in Mumbai, India. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(5):1806–1811
  49. Breurec S, Zriouil SB, Fall C, et al. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineages in five major African towns: emergence and spread of atypical clones. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;in press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03219.xAccessed September 21, 2010
  50. Enany S, Yaoita E, Yoshida Y, et al. Molecular characterization of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Egypt. Microbiol Res. 2010;165(2):152–162
  51. Ghebremedhin B, Olugbosi MO, Raji AM, et al. Emergence of a community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain with a unique resistance profile in southwest Nigeria. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(9):2975–2980
  52. Reyes J, Rincon S, Diaz L, et al. Dissemination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 sequence type 8 lineage in Latin America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(12):1861–1867
  53. Ho PL, Cheung C, Mak GC, et al. Molecular epidemiology and household transmission of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Hong Kong. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;57(2):145–151
  54. Ruimy R, Armand-Lefevre L, Barbier F, et al. Comparisons between geographically diverse samples of carried Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(18):5577–5583
  55. Jenney A, Ritka R, Holt D, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping of staphylococcal isolates from Fiji. In: Programs and abstracts of the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australasian Society of Infectious Diseases. Darwin (Australia), May 26–29, 2010.
  56. Chambers HF, Deleo FR. Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(9):629–641
  57. Gillet Y, Issartel B, Vanhems P, et al. Association between Staphylococcus aureus strains carrying gene for Panton-Valentine leukocidin and highly lethal necrotising pneumonia in young immunocompetent patients. Lancet. 2002;359(9308):753–759
  58. Lina G, Piemont Y, Godail-Gamot F, et al. Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29(5):1128–1132
  59. Bae IG, Tonthat GT, Stryjewski ME, et al. Presence of genes encoding the Panton-Valentine leukocidin exotoxin is not the primary determinant of outcome in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: results of a multinational trial. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(12):3952–3957
  60. Nickerson EK, Wuthiekanun V, Wongsuvan G, et al. Factors predicting and reducing mortality in patients with invasive Staphylococcus aureus disease in a developing country. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6512
  61. Bubeck Wardenburg J, Palazzolo-Ballance AM, Otto M, et al. Panton-Valentine leukocidin is not a virulence determinant in murine models of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease. J Infect Dis. 2008;198(8):1166–1170
  62. Brown EL, Dumitrescu O, Thomas D, et al. The Panton-Valentine leukocidin vaccine protects mice against lung and skin infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus USA300. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15(2):156–164
  63. Tseng CW, Kyme P, Low J, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin contributes to inflammation and muscle tissue injury. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6387
  64. Munckhof WJ, Nimmo GR, Carney J, et al. Methicillin-susceptible, non-multiresistant methicillin-resistant and multiresistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a clinical, epidemiological and microbiological comparative study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;27(5):355–364
  65. Muttaiyah S, Coombs G, Pandey S, et al. Incidence, risk factors and outcome of Panton-Valentine leukocidin positive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections in Auckland, New Zealand. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(10):3470–3474
  66. Breurec S, Fall C, Pouillot R, et al. Epidemiology of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus lineages in five major African towns: high prevalence of Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;in press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03320.xAccessed September 21, 2010
  67. Lawrence G, Leafasia J, Sheridan J, et al. Control of scabies, skin sores and haematuria in children in the Solomon Islands: another role for ivermectin. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(1):34–42
  68. Taplin D, Porcelain SL, Meinking TL, et al. Community control of scabies: a model based on use of permethrin cream. Lancet. 1991;337:1016–1018
  69. Carapetis JR, Connors C, Yarmirr D, et al. Success of a scabies control program in an Australian aboriginal community. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16(5):494–499
  70. Mahe A, Prual A, Konate M, et al. Skin diseases of children in Mali: a public health problem. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89(5):467–470
  71. Ferrieri P, Dajani AS, Wannamaker LW, et al. Natural history of impetigo. I. Site sequence of acquisition and familial patterns of spread of cutaneous streptococci. J Clin Invest. 1972;51(11):2851–2862
  72. Hegazy AA, Darwish NM, Abdel-Hamid IA, et al. Epidemiology and control of scabies in an Egyptian village. Int J Dermatol. 1999;38(4):291–295
  73. Luby SP, Agboatwalla M, Feikin DR, et al. Effect of handwashing on child health: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9481):225–233
  74. Lehmann D, Tennant MT, Silva DT, et al. Benefits of swimming pools in two remote aboriginal communities in western Australia: intervention study. BMJ. 2003;327(7412):415–419
  75. Wolk DM, Struelens MJ, Pancholi P, et al. Rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in wound specimens and blood cultures: multicenter preclinical evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert MRSA/SA skin and soft tissue and blood culture assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(3):823–826
  76. Badiou C, Dumitrescu O, George N, et al. Rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin in clinical specimens by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunochromatographic tests. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(4):1384–1390
  77. Steer AC, Tikoduadua LV, Manalac EM, et al. Validation of an integrated management of childhood illness algorithm for managing common skin conditions in Fiji. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(3):173–179
  78. Lee MC, Rios AM, Aten MF, et al. Management and outcome of children with skin and soft tissue abscesses caused by community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23(2):123–127
  79. Haley CE, Marling-Cason M, Smith JW, et al. Bactericidal activity of antiseptics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;21(6):991–992
  80. MacDonald RS. Treatment of impetigo: paint it blue. BMJ. 2004;329(7472):979
  81. Okano M, Noguchi S, Tabata K, et al. Topical gentian violet for cutaneous infection and nasal carriage with MRSA. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39(12):942–944
  82. Saji M, Taguchi S, Uchiyama K, et al. Efficacy of gentian violet in the eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from skin lesions. J Hosp Infect. 1995;31(3):225–228
  83. Koning S, Verhagen AP, van Suijlekom-Smit LW, et al. Interventions for impetigo. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2:CD003261
  84. Jones JC, Rogers TJ, Brookmeyer P, et al. Mupirocin resistance in patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a surgical intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(5):541–547
  85. Alsterholm M, Flytstrom I, Bergbrant IM, et al. Fusidic acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in impetigo contagiosa and secondarily infected atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2010;90(1):52–57
  86. Dobie D, Gray J. Fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(1):74–77
  87. Ahn SY, Ingulli E. Acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis: an update. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008;20(2):157–162
  88. Dumitrescu O, Badiou C, Bes M, et al. Effect of antibiotics, alone and in combination, on Panton-Valentine leukocidin production by a Staphylococcus aureus reference strain. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14(4):384–388
  89. Szczesiul JM, Shermock KM, Murtaza UI, et al. No decrease in clindamycin susceptibility despite increased use of clindamycin for pediatric community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26(9):852–854
  90. Han LL, McDougal LK, Gorwitz RJ, et al. High frequencies of clindamycin and tetracycline resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pulsed-field type USA300 isolates collected at a Boston Ambulatory Health Center. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(4):1350–1352
  91. Fiebelkorn KR, Crawford SA, McElmeel ML, et al. Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(10):4740–4744
  92. Siberry GK, Tekle T, Carroll K, et al. Failure of clindamycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance in vitro. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37(9):1257–1260
  93. Tong SY, Andrews RM, Kearns T, et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with benzathine penicillin for treatment of impetigo in aboriginal children: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J Paediatr Child Health. 2010;46(3):131–133
  94. Hyun DY, Mason EO, Forbes A, et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or clindamycin for treatment of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(1):57–59
  95. Falagas ME, Siempos , Vardakas KZ. Linezolid versus glycopeptide or beta-lactam for treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8(1):53–66
  96. Beibei L, Yun C, Mengli C, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;35(1):3–12
  97. Cohen PR. The skin in the gym: a comprehensive review of the cutaneous manifestations of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in athletes. Clin Dermatol. 2008;26(1):16–26
  98. Turabelidze G, Lin M, Wolkoff B, et al. Personal hygiene and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(3):422–427
  99. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in correctional facilities–Georgia, California, and Texas, 2001-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(41):992–996
  100. Ellis MW, Hospenthal DR, Dooley DP, et al. Natural history of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in soldiers. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(7):971–979
  101. Campbell KM, Vaughn AF, Russell KL, et al. Risk factors for community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in an outbreak of disease among military trainees in San Diego, California, in 2002. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(9):4050–4053
  102. Wiese-Posselt M, Heuck D, Draeger A, et al. Successful termination of a furunculosis outbreak due to lukS-lukF-positive, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a German village by stringent decolonization, 2002–2005. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(11):e88–e95
  103. Stevens AM, Hennessy T, Baggett HC, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage and risk factors for skin infections, southwestern Alaska, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(5):797–803
  104. Nguyen DM, Mascola L, Brancoft E. Recurring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in a football team. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(4):526–532
  105. Baggett HC, Hennessy TW, Rudolph K, et al. Community-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with antibiotic use and the cytotoxin Panton-Valentine leukocidin during a furunculosis outbreak in rural Alaska. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(9):1565–1573
  106. Romano R, Lu D, Holtom P. Outbreak of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections among a collegiate football team. J Athl Train. 2006;41(2):141–145
  107. Ellis MW, Griffith ME, Dooley DP, et al. Targeted intranasal mupirocin to prevent colonization and infection by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in soldiers: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(10):3591–3598
  108. Gorwitz RJ, Jernigan DB, Powers JH, et al. Strategies for the clinical management of MRSA in the community: summary of an experts’ meeting convened by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/ar/CAMRSA_ExpMtgStrategies.pdf2006;Accessed July 10, 2010
  109. Coronado F, Nicholas JA, Wallace BJ, et al. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections in a religious community. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135(3):492–501
  110. Wootton SH, Arnold K, Hill HA, et al. Intervention to reduce the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections in a correctional facility in Georgia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25(5):402–407
  111. Schaffer AC, Lee JC. Vaccination and passive immunisation against Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;32(Suppl 1):S71–S78
  112. Shinefield H, Black S, Fattom A, et al. Use of a Staphylococcus aureus conjugate vaccine in patients receiving hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(7):491–496
  113. Etz H, Minh DB, Henics T, et al. Identification of in vivo expressed vaccine candidate antigens from Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(10):6573–6578
  114. Shah PS, Kaufman DA. Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulins to prevent staphylococcal infection in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD006449

 ST is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Postdoctoral fellowship (436,033).

 The authors have nothing to disclose.

PII: S0733-8635(10)00177-4

doi:10.1016/j.det.2010.09.005

Dermatologic Clinics
Volume 29, Issue 1 , Pages 21-32, January 2011

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution