Sunscreen Product Formulation

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Dermatologic Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • O'Neill J.J.
        Effect of film irregularities on sunscreen efficacy.
        J Pharm Sci. 1984; 73: 888-891
        • Ferrero L.
        • Pissavini M.
        • Marguerie S.
        • et al.
        Efficiency of a continuous height distribution model of sunscreen film geometry to predict a realistic sun protection factor.
        J Cosmet Sci. 2003; 54: 463-481
        • Anderson M.W.
        • Hewitt J.P.
        • Spruce S.R.
        Broad-spectrum physical sunscreens: titanium dioxide and zinc oxide.
        in: Lowe N.J. Shaath N.A. Pathak M.A. Sunscreens development, evaluation, and regulatory aspects. 2nd edition. Marcel Dekker, New York1997: 353-397
        • Wilkinson M.A.
        • Moore R.J.
        Sunscreen, suntan and anti-sunburn products.
        in: Godwin G. Harry's cosmeticology. 7th edition. Logman House, London1982: 222-263
        • Phillips T.J.
        • Bhawan J.
        • Yaar M.
        • et al.
        Effect of daily versus intermittent sunscreen application on solar simulated UV radiation-induced skin response in humans.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000; 43: 610-618
        • Grosick T.L.
        • Tanner P.
        Efficacy as used, not as tested, is true measure of sunscreen performance.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004; 50: 31
        • Klein K.
        Encyclopedia of UV absorbers for sunscreen products.
        Cosmetics & Toiletries. 1992; 107: 45-64
        • Diffey B.L.
        A method for broad-spectrum classification of sunscreens.
        Int J Cosmet Sci. 1994; 16: 47-52
        • Nash J.F.
        • Tanner P.
        • Grosick T.L.
        • et al.
        Sunscreen market analysis: the evolution and use of UVA-I actives.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004; 50: 34
        • Johncock W.
        Sunscreen interactions in formulations.
        Cosmetics & Toiletries. 1999; 114: 75-82
        • Bonda C.
        Solvent polarity and sunscreen photostability.
        J Cosmet Sci. 2003; 54: 87-89
        • Chaudhuri R.K.
        Photo stable organic sunscreen compositions. US Patent 2004/0247536. 2004
        • Gonzenbach H.U.
        • Pittet G.
        US Patent 6,033,649, Light screening agents. 2000
        • Georgalas A.
        • Kasprzyk E.
        • Jung A.
        Inorganic sunscreen dispersions: experience with development and evaluation for efficacy and aesthetics.
        J Cosmet Sci. 2004; 55: 414-420
        • Klein K.
        Sunscreen products: formulation and regulatory considerations.
        in: Lowe N.J. Shaath N.A. Pathak M.A. Sunscreens development, evaluation, and regulatory aspects. 2nd edition. Marcel Dekker, New York1997: 285-311
        • Vaughan C.D.
        The solubility parameter: what is it?.
        Cosmetics & Toiletries. 1991; 106: 69-73