Advertisement

Integrating Skin Cancer–Related Technologies into Clinical Practice

Published:August 11, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2017.06.018

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Dermatologic Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • March J.
        • Hand M.
        • Grossman D.
        Practical application of new technologies for melanoma diagnosis: Part I. Noninvasive approaches.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 72: 929-941
        • Mayer J.E.
        • Swetter S.M.
        • Fu T.
        • et al.
        Screening, early detection, education, and trends for melanoma: Current status (2007-2013) and future directions. Part I. Epidemiology, high-risk groups, clinical strategies, and diagnostic technology.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014; 71: 599.e1-12
        • Piccolo D.
        • Ferrari A.
        • Peris K.
        • et al.
        Dermoscopic diagnosis by a trained clinician vs. a clinician with minimal dermoscopy training vs. computer-aided diagnosis of 341 pigmented skin lesions: a comparative study.
        Br J Dermatol. 2002; 147: 481-486
        • Rigel D.S.
        • Russak J.
        • Friedman R.
        The evolution of melanoma diagnosis: 25 years beyond the ABCDs.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2010; 60: 301-316
        • Markowitz O.
        Handbook on dermoscopy: a color wheel approach.
        1st edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2016
        • Dolianitis C.
        • Kelly J.
        • Wolfe R.
        • et al.
        Comparative performance of 4 dermoscopic algorithms by nonexperts for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.
        Arch Dermatol. 2005; 141: 1008-1014
        • Sondak V.K.
        • Glass L.F.
        • Geller A.C.
        Risk-stratified screening for detection of melanoma.
        JAMA. 2015; 313: 616-617
        • Kellner C.
        • Reinhold U.
        Modern diagnostic procedures in dermatological oncology.
        Pathologe. 2015; 36: 11-15
        • Shoo B.A.
        • Sagebiel R.W.
        • Kashani-Sabet M.
        Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma at a melanoma referral center.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010; 62: 751-756
        • Vestergaard M.E.
        • Macaskill P.
        • Holt P.E.
        • et al.
        Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting.
        Br J Dermatol. 2008; 159: 669-676
        • Thomas N.E.
        • Kricker A.
        • Waxweiler W.T.
        • et al.
        Comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival of histopathologically amelanotic and pigmented melanomas.
        JAMA Dermatol. 2014; 150: 1306-1314
        • Skvara H.
        • Teban L.
        • Fiebiger M.
        • et al.
        Limitations of dermoscopy in the recognition of melanoma.
        Arch Dermatol. 2005; 141: 155-160
        • Mascolo M.
        • Russo D.
        • Scalvenzi M.
        • et al.
        Pitfalls in the dermoscopic diagnosis of amelanotic melanoma.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 72: S2-S3
        • Elbaum M.
        • Kopf A.W.
        • Rabinovitz H.S.
        • et al.
        Automatic differentiation of melanoma and melanocytic nevi with multispectral digital dermoscopy: a feasibility study.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001; 44: 207-218
        • Monheit G.
        • Cognetta A.B.
        • Ferris L.
        • et al.
        The performance of MelaFind: a prospective multicenter study.
        Arch Dermatol. 2011; 147: 188-194
      1. Winkelmann RR, Tucker N, White R, et al. Evaluating diagnostic enhancement with multi-spectral digital skin lesion analysis: a meta-analysis of 5 studies. Poster presentation: Winter Clinical Dermatology Conference. Kaanapali (HI), January 16–21, 2014.

        • Winkelmann R.R.
        • Rigel D.S.
        • Kollmann E.
        • et al.
        Negative predictive value of pigmented lesion evaluation by multispectral digital skin lesion analysis in a community practice setting.
        J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015; 8: 20-22
        • Busam K.J.
        • Hester K.
        • Charles C.
        • et al.
        Detection of clinically amelanotic malignant melanoma and assessment of its margins by in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM).
        Arch Dermatol. 2001; 137: 923-929
        • Langley R.G.
        • Rajadhyaksha M.
        • Dwyer P.J.
        • et al.
        Confocal scanning laser microscopy of benign and malignant melanocytic skin lesions in vivo.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001; 45: 365-376
        • Charles C.A.
        • Marghoob A.A.
        • Busam K.J.
        • et al.
        Melanoma or pigmented basal cell carcinoma: a clinical-pathologic correlation with dermoscopy, in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy, and routine histology.
        Skin Res Technol. 2002; 8: 282-287
        • Stevenson A.R.
        • Mickan S.
        • Mallett S.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy for melanoma diagnosis in patients with clinically equivocal skin lesions.
        Dermatol Pract Concept. 2013; 3: 19-27
        • Pellacani G.
        • Pepe P.
        • Casari A.
        • et al.
        Reflectance confocal microscopy as a second-level examination in skin oncology improves diagnostic accuracy and saves unnecessary excisions: a longitudinal prospective study.
        Br J Dermatol. 2014; 171: 1044-1051
        • Guitera P.
        • Pellacani G.
        • Longo C.
        • et al.
        In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy enhances secondary evaluation of melanocytic lesions.
        J Invest Dermatol. 2009; 129: 131-138
        • Van Dijk M.C.
        • Aben K.K.
        • van Hees F.
        Expert review remains important in the histological diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic lesions.
        Histopathology. 2008; 52: 139-146
        • Veenhuizen K.C.
        • De Wit P.E.
        • Mooi W.J.
        • et al.
        Quality assessment by expert opinion in melanoma pathology: experience of the pathology panel of the Dutch Melanoma Working Party.
        J Pathol. 1997; 182: 266-272
        • Farmer E.R.
        • Gonin R.
        • Hanna M.P.
        Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic nevi between expert pathologists.
        Hum Pathol. 1996; 27: 528-531
        • Suarez A.
        • High W.A.
        Principles of molecular diagnostics and personalized cancer medicine.
        in: Chapter 34: immunohistochemical and molecular diagnosis of melanoma. 1st edition. Lippincott Williams & Winkins, Philadelphia2013: 434-450
        • George E.
        • Polissar N.L.
        • Wick M.
        Immunohistochemical evaluation of p16INK4A, E-cadherin, and cyclin D1 expression in melanoma and Spitz tumors.
        Am J Clin Pathol. 2010; 133: 370-379
        • Mason A.
        • Wititsuwannakul J.
        • Klump V.R.
        • et al.
        Expression of p16 alone does not differentiate between Spitz nevi and Spitzoid melanoma.
        J Cutan Pathol. 2012; 39: 1062-1074
        • Gerami P.
        • Busam K.J.
        Cytogenetic and mutational analyses of melanocytic tumors.
        Dermatol Clin. 2012; 30: 555-566
      2. Neogenomics, Inc NeoSITE™ Melanoma: next-Generation FISH analysis for ambiguous melanocytic lesions. Available at: http://www.neogenomics.com/neosite-melanoma.htm. Accessed June 18, 2015.

        • Tetzlaff M.T.
        • Wang W.L.
        • Milless T.L.
        • et al.
        Ambiguous melanocytic tumors in a tertiary referral center: the contribution of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to conventional histopathologic and immunophenotypic analyses.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37: 1783-1796
        • Kerl K.
        • Palmedo G.
        • Wiesner T.
        • et al.
        A proposal for improving multicolor FISH sensitivity in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma using new combined criteria.
        Am J Dermatopathol. 2012; 34: 580-585
        • Zembowicz A.
        • Yang S.E.
        • Kafanas A.
        • et al.
        Correlation between histologic assessment and fluorescence in situ hybridization using MelanoSITE in evaluation of histologically ambiguous melanocytic lesions.
        Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012; 136: 1671-1679
        • North J.P.
        • Vemula S.S.
        • Bastian B.C.
        Chromosomal copy number analysis in melanoma diagnostics.
        Methods Mol Biol. 2014; 1102: 199-226
        • Ali L.
        • Helm T.
        • Cheney R.
        • et al.
        Correlating array comparative genomic hybridization findings with histology and outcome in spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms.
        Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2010; 3: 593-599
        • Clark L.E.
        • Warf M.B.
        • Flake D.D.
        • et al.
        Clinical validation of a gene expression signature that differentiates benign nevi from malignant melanoma.
        J Cutan Pathol. 2015; 42: 244-252
      3. Clarke LE, Berking C, Tahan S, et al. Development of a gene expression signature to differentiate malignant melanoma from benign melanocytic nevi. Poster presentation: Society for Melanoma Research International Congress. Philadelphia, November 17–19, 2013.

      4. Clarke LE, Bess E, Kolquist K, et al. A clinically validated gene expression score impacts diagnosis and management recommendations of melanocytic lesions by dermatopathologists. Poster presentation: College of American Pathologists Meeting. Chicago, September 7–10, 2014.

        • Lawson D.H.
        • Russell M.
        • Wilkinson J.
        • et al.
        Gene expression profile of primary cutaneous melanomas to distinguish between low and high risk of metastasis.
        J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: s9022
        • Gerami P.
        • Cook R.W.
        • Wilkinson J.
        • et al.
        Development of a prognostic genetic signature to predict the metastatic risk associated with melanoma.
        Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21: 175-181
        • Gerami P.
        • Cook R.W.
        • Russell M.C.
        • et al.
        Gene expression profiling for molecular staging of cutaneous melanoma in patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 72: 780-785.e3
        • Winkelmann R.R.
        • Rigel D.S.
        Summary of dermatologist assessment and management of dysplastic nevi: a follow-up survey.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 73: 27-29
      5. Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed December 20, 2016.

        • Richard M.A.
        • Barnetche T.
        • Rouzaud M.
        • et al.
        Evidence-based recommendations on the role of dermatologists in the diagnosis and management of psoriatic arthritis: systematic review and expert opinion.
        J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014; 28s5: 3-12
        • Argenziano G.
        • Puig S.
        • Zalaudek I.
        • et al.
        Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 1877-1882
        • Bono A.
        • Bartoli C.
        • Cascinelli N.
        • et al.
        Melanoma detection. A prospective study comparing diagnosis with the naked eye, dermatoscopy and telespectrophotometry.
        Dermatology. 2002; 205: 362-366
        • Bono A.
        • Tolomio E.
        • Trincone S.
        • et al.
        Micro-melanoma detection: a clinical study on 206 consecutive cases of pigmented skin lesions with a diameter < or = 3 mm.
        Br J Dermatol. 2006; 155: 570-573
        • Cristofolini M.
        • Zumiani G.
        • Bauer P.
        • et al.
        Dermatoscopy: usefulness in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous pigmentary lesions.
        Melanoma Res. 1994; 4: 391-394
        • Benelli C.
        • Roscetti E.
        • Dal Pozzo V.
        • et al.
        The dermoscopic versus the clinical diagnosis of melanoma.
        Eur J Dermatol. 1999; 9: 470-476
        • Curchin C.E.S.
        • Wurm E.M.T.
        • Lambie D.L.J.
        • et al.
        First experiences using reflectance confocal microscopy on equivocal skin lesions in Queensland.
        Australas J Dermatol. 2011; 52: 89-97
        • Guitera P.
        • Pellacani G.
        • Crotty K.A.
        • et al.
        The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the diagnostic accuracy of lentigo maligna and equivocal pigmented and nonpigmented macules of the face.
        J Invest Dermatol. 2010; 130: 2080-2091
        • Pellacani G.
        • Guitera P.
        • Longo C.
        • et al.
        The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnostic accuracy of melanoma and equivocal melanocytic lesions.
        J Invest Dermatol. 2007; 127: 2759-2765
        • Langley R.G.
        • Walsh N.
        • Sutherland A.E.
        • et al.
        The diagnostic accuracy of in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy compared to dermoscopy of benign and malignant melanocytic lesions: A prospective study.
        Dermatology. 2007; 215: 365-372
        • Cerroni L.
        • Barnhill R.
        • Elder D.
        • et al.
        Melanocytic tumors of uncertain malignant potential: results of a tutorial held at the XXIX Symposium of the International Society of Dermatopathology in Graz, October 2008.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2010; 34: 314-326
        • Ohsie S.J.
        • Sarantopoulos G.P.
        • Cochran A.J.
        • et al.
        Immunohistochemical characteristics of melanoma.
        J Cutan Pathol. 2008; 35: 433-444
        • Bastian B.C.
        • Olshen A.B.
        • LeBoit P.E.
        • et al.
        Classifying melanocytic tumors based on DNA copy number changes.
        Am J Pathol. 2003; 163: 1765-1770
        • Wang L.
        • Rao M.
        • Fang Y.
        • et al.
        A genome-wide high resolution array CGH analysis of cutaneous melanoma and comparison of aCGH to FISH in diagnostic evaluation.
        J Mol Diagn. 2013; 15: 581-591
        • Gerami P.
        • Jewell S.S.
        • Morrison L.E.
        • et al.
        Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as an ancillary diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of melanoma.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2009; 33: 1146-1156
        • Gaiser T.
        • Kutzner H.
        • Palmedo G.
        • et al.
        Classifying ambiguous melanocytic lesions with FISH and correlation with clinical long-term follow up.
        Mod Pathol. 2010; 23: 413-419
        • Vergier B.
        • Prochazkova-Carlotti M.
        • de la Fouchardiere A.
        • et al.
        Fluorescence in situ hybridization, a diagnostic aid in ambiguous melanocytic tumors: European study of 113 cases.
        Mod Pathol. 2011; 24: 613
        • Sanford B.A.
        • Chia-Chien H.
        The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus.
        Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 2007; 12: 1-8
        • Gottlieb A.B.
        • Levin A.A.
        • Armstrong A.W.
        • et al.
        The International Dermatology Outcome Measures Group: formation of patient-centered outcome measures in dermatology.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 72: 345-348
        • Friedman R.J.
        • Rigel D.S.
        • Kopf A.W.
        Early detection of malignant melanoma: the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 1985; 35: 130-151
        • Rigel D.S.
        • Friedman R.J.
        The rationale of the ABCDs of early melanoma.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993; 29: 1060-1061
        • Kopf A.W.
        • Welkovich B.
        • Frankel R.E.
        • et al.
        Thickness of malignant melanoma: global analysis of related factors.
        J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1987; 13 (401–20): 345-390
        • Abbasi N.R.
        • Shaw H.M.
        • Rigel D.S.
        • et al.
        Early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: revisiting the ABCD criteria.
        JAMA. 2004; 292: 2771-2776
        • Scope A.
        • Dusza S.W.
        • Halpern A.C.
        • et al.
        The “ugly duckling” sign: agreement between observers.
        Arch Dermatol. 2008; 144: 58-64
        • March J.
        • Hand M.
        • Truong A.
        • et al.
        Practical application of new technologies for melanoma diagnosis: Part II. Molecular approaches.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 72: 943-958